![]() But he added that he never met Jackie in person and never took her out on a date. When the Post reached out to him, he said he "was familiar with Jackie's name. Although Jackie didn't originally tell Rolling Stone reporter Sabrina Rubin Erdely the name(s) of her alleged attackers, the Washington Post reports that Jackie has now revealed the name of one of the men. Update, 12/6, 12:50 p.m.: The Washington Post has now published more information from interviews with Jackie's friends and other people involved with the story. ![]() We'll update this story as the details develop. The retraction of a high-profile story like this one, warranted or not, could discourage women from coming forward in the future. If it does turn out to be inaccurate, it could provide fuel to the fire of those who claim rape culture is an exaggeration, even though research shows that only about 2 percent of rape accusations turn out to be false. Female students report rapes in disturbingly low numbers - while 1 in 5 college women are sexually assaulted, only about 5 percent report their assaults - often because their schools fail to respond or punish their rapists, and they're left with, at best, trauma and a bad reputation. Whether "A Rape on Campus" turns out to be true or not, this controversy alone is damaging to the fight to stop the campus rape epidemic in America. But according to the Washington Post article, "a group of Jackie's close friends" have come forward and said "they believe something traumatic happened to Jackie but have come to doubt her account." Post reporters were also unable to corroborate Jackie's story, but they did interview her and she said that the " Rolling Stone account of her attack was truthful but also acknowledged that some details in the article might not be accurate." The details the fraternity refutes seem minimal in the grand scheme of the story (and they say the story came out in 2012, not 2014). Her friends and rape activists on campus strongly supported Jackie's account.Īccording to a more in-depth article on the Washington Post, Rolling Stone's "Note" could be an attempt to preempt a statement from the University of Virginia's Phi Kappa Psi fraternity, where the gang rape allegedly took place, which was issued a few hours later. In the months Erdely spent reporting the story, Jackie neither said nor did anything that made Erdely, or Rolling Stone's editors and fact-checkers, question Jackie's credibility. ![]() The "Note" states:īecause of the sensitive nature of Jackie's story, we decided to honor her request not to contact the man she claimed orchestrated the attack on her nor any of the men she claimed participated in the attack for fear of retaliation against her. Other reporters have blamed any inaccuracies on Rolling Stone and Erdely for not trying to interview Jackie's alleged rapists for the other side of the story. It doesn't say that she lied to reporter Sabrina Rubin Erdely, only that there are discrepancies, which could mean that Jackie didn't remember things accurately or left out parts of the story she didn't see as relevant, or something else entirely. Rolling Stone's new statement, titled "A Note to Our Readers," blames holes in the story on Jackie, but is extremely vague about what parts of the story are inaccurate. ![]() *The alleged assault was actually in September 2012. Through our extensive reporting and fact-checking, we found Jackie to be entirely credible and courageous and we are proud to have given her disturbing story the attention it deserves. The indifference with which her complaint was met was, we discovered, sadly consistent with the experience of many other UVA women who have tried to report such assaults. The story we published was one woman's account of a sexual assault at a UVA fraternity in October 2012* - and the subsequent ordeal she experienced at the hands of University administrators in her attempts to work her way through the trauma of that evening. The statement appears to go back on a different PR statement the magazine issued earlier this week, which said: Today, Rolling Stone issued a statement saying that "there now appear to be discrepancies in Jackie's account, and we have come to the conclusion that our trust in her was misplaced." The recent powerful Rolling Stone story, " A Rape on Campus," which details the alleged campus gang rape of a University of Virginia student named Jackie and the university's failure to respond to the rape, has come under criticism this week for supposed holes in the story's reporting.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |